Whether your experience is similar to the story to the right or not, we all face tough dilemmas in our personal and professional lives. We can help you think through these difficult decisions and come to moral resolutions. |
How does one find the moral courage to challenge company policy?
A father of two must decide where to spend his time: home or work.
When is an exception worth giving?
Are all résumé typos accidental?
HR isn’t always clear on which questions to ask or answer.
Highland Electricity is well-known for supporting community projects, and in recent years has increased its corporate giving. The company has also recently defined its giving strategy, particularly in how it relates to their business objectives. As part of this overall effort, Highland clarifies its giving guidelines. There are four broad funding areas (Job training and economic development, Education, Emergency preparedness, and Environmental stewardship), and grants are ideally awarded to organizations within the company's service area.
Arts and cultural organizations, which are not included in the four funding areas, have received few grants in recent years. Numerous arts organizations have been turned down with the explanation that the company is focusing its resources in its strategic funding areas. Requests from other organizations are turned down because they are outside the utility's defined service territory.
Contributions manager Clarissa Watt has recently received two funding requests from high-level managers within the company. The first is to provide a large (up to $25,000) grant to an arts center in a small town in the service territory. A chief regulatory official's wife serves on the art center's board. The second request is for a grant to a nonprofit organization outside the service territory, but within the district of a very influential state legislator.
Both organizations are deserving of funding, and the activities to be funded are reasonable.
Though no linkage of any kind is asked for, offered, or implied by the regulator or the legislator, the internal promoters of the grants feel these contributions will provide opportunities for contact, relationship building, and good will that would serve the company well.
However, both grants are clearly outside the company's guidelines. And making an exception in either case could prove awkward and raise expectations among other organizations that do not meet the guidelines. On the other hand, granting funds for these two commendable projects could help their respective communities and create positive fallout for the company.
Should Clarissa stick to the giving guidelines? Or should she make these exceptions for the sake of helping two deserving organizations while boosting her company at the same time?
Read more dilemmas: Business Dilemmas | Philanthropy Dilemmas
Note: This and other dilemmas on this site come to you without their real-life resolutions. We encourage you to think for yourself about how you might resolve them, since the nature of each dilemma is highly individualistic. In sharing these dilemmas, we do not endorse them in any way, but rather offer them for your consideration.
View all dilemmas