Assisted Suicide Fuels Debate in Germany
Jul 7th, 2008 • Posted in: NewsIn other medical and bioethics news, Nobel laureates call for change in intellectual property law for medical research, and British physician pioneers new embryo screening process
VARIOUS DATELINES
Stories at the intersection of medicine, biology, and ethics were featured in the world press last week. Among them:
- The German upper house passed a measure tightening restrictions on assisted suicide after a bizarre case in which a politician helped a healthy 79-year-old woman end her life. According to a report from the Agence France-Presse, Roger Kusch, a former senator who is now a right-to-die campaigner, showed Bettina Schart how to prepare a lethal drug cocktail. Schart was not suffering a life-threatening illness, reports the AFP, but had no family and did not want to spend the end of her life in a nursing home. Kusch, a lawyer, did not violate any laws and kept a camera running during the entire suicide to prove that he was not legally culpable. It is not illegal in Germany to advise someone on suicide as long as there is no physical assistance to the person committing suicide. The proposed law would make it a crime to offer advice on how to commit suicide, according to the AFP.
- Out-of-date intellectual property laws are no longer suited to modern science and can “impede innovation, lead to monopolization, and unduly restrict access to the benefits of knowledge,” according to professor Sir John Sulston and professor Joseph Stiglitz. The two Nobel laureates, writing in the Times of London, contend that intellectual property law in Britain and elsewhere increasingly is being manipulated to stanch competition and direct research toward profits rather than humanitarian goals. The call comes as the University of Manchester convenes a conference of scientists and bioethicists to draw up a manifesto for changes in intellectual property law, reports the Times.
- A London physician recently used a new genetic screening process to ensure that a baby was free of a gene that could lead to a rare hereditary cancer. According to ABC News, the process — an innovation in Britain — involves screening an embryo before implantation, with only embryos that pass the test actually being implanted. But ABC notes that some doctors worry that the process could someday be used to screen for traits like intelligence or attractiveness, and quotes University of Pennsylvania bioethicist Arthur Caplan as saying the procedure puts medicine on a moral slippery slope: “Where is this going to take us in the future? How far will we go in letting people decide their babies?” Caplan said.
Sources: AFP, July 5 — Times of London, July 5 — ABC News, June 30.
For more information, see: Related Newsline story, June 23 — Related Newsline story, Mar. 24 — Related Newsline story, Mar. 10 — Related Newsline story, Jan. 28 — Related Newsline story, Dec. 17, 2007.
Print This Story
Email This Story









[...] more information, see: Related Newsline story, Sep. 22 — Related Newsline story, July 7 — Related Newsline story, June 23 — Related Newsline story, Nov. 5, 2007 [...]
[...] more information, see: Related Newsline story, July 7 — Related Newsline story, Mar. 24 — Related Newsline story, Jan. 28 [...]
[...] more information, see: Related Newsline story, July 7 — Related Newsline story, Apr. 13 — Related Newsline story, Apr. 7 [...]