U.S. Public Unhappy with Negative Tone of Presidential Campaign
Oct 20th, 2008 • Posted in: Statline
For more information, see this week’s Research Report.

For more information, see this week’s Research Report.
by Rushworth M. Kidder
Okay, enough hand-wringing. It’s time for a solution-oriented approach to the current economic crisis. To get there, we need to ask three questions.
First, what caused it? We may never fully know. Some probable causes are easy to understand, like Wall Street excesses, regulatory inattention, and unscrupulous mortgage lending. Others are nearly incomprehensible, like derivatives, collateralized debt obligations, and credit default swaps. Still others are too amorphous for words — ghostly fears, leaping like pale sparks from market to market, spooking investors, and scorching trust.
But running like an obbligato beneath them all is the persistent murmur of a single word: unethical. There’s a feeling in the air that what’s happened has been not simply illegal but profoundly immoral. There’s a sense that core decencies have been demolished, integrity dissolved, and common values trampled upon to an unprecedented degree.
Second, who’s to blame? Not just the leaders. There’s a growing recognition that entire organizations, not just their top executives, can go off the rails. Like individuals, corporations can develop wholesale cultures of greed, fraud, and deceit. Regulatory agencies and congressional committees, too, can slide into irresponsibility, blame shifting, and turf wars. Sure, we take grim satisfaction in seeing top executives nailed for turpitude, but our intuitions tell us that the problem is bigger than that. In some organizations, the culture itself is so toxic that few employees dare call attention to misconduct — and is so deaf that whenever anyone does speak up, nobody listens.
Third, what can be done? In the coming months, the media will gorge on scandalous tales of malfeasance, as CNN already is doing in a listing titled, “Ten Most Wanted: Culprits of the Collapse.” Useful? Sure, if the fault lies in individuals. But if we’re going to shift from suspicions to solutions, we need to look at organizational cultures. We need to know not just what makes bad ones worse, but what makes good ones better. We need, in other words, the “Ten Most Wanted” characteristics of cultures of integrity — what they are, what they do, and how to build them.
So here’s a start. Based on years of research at our Institute, we think cultures of integrity arise when organizations do the following:
If every organization in the world approximated these characteristics enough to warrant the “culture of integrity” label, we’d be left with only one question: How could a financial crisis like the one we’re in ever happen again? If we want the answer to be, It couldn’t, we need to solve today’s problems in ways that ensure such crises never recur. How? By deliberately building cultures of integrity across business and government. Nobody said that’s easy, but nothing less will do.
©2008 Institute for Global Ethics
Questions or comments? Write to newsline@globalethics.org.
Last week’s commentary by Rushworth Kidder, examining the ethical obligation to correct others’ lies, drew a number of comments from readers. One wrote: “To me, the insidious nature of the lie that is unchallenged is doubly corrosive. There is the lie itself, which is destructive of the public’s right to know and ability to make judgments, and then there is the silence of the individual, which eats at the character of the one who is silent.” Another conjectured that the incident cited in the commentary was typical of the modern “good cop/bad cop” political team tactic, where “the silence or subtle inference can be more than an ethical question mark. This is a coordinated approach with lieutenants lying as the leader(s) retain plausible deniability.”
– Compiled by Ethics Newsline® editor Carl Hausman
“There’s no question that the department has been stretched thin when it comes to resources generally, and that has affected white-collar enforcement in a variety of areas.”
– Former U.S. deputy attorney general Paul McNulty, speaking to the New York Times in a piece examining the FBI’s current dearth of funding and staffing to prosecute white-collar crimes amidst financial fraud in the current economic collapse. The Times notes that “more than 1,800 agents, or nearly one-third of all agents in criminal programs,” were shifted to national security duties in the wake of 9/11, leaving the white-collar crime division undermanned. Even as FBI officials realized in 2003 and 2004 that trouble was brewing in the financial sector, the agency’s requests for more staffing and funding were largely spurned. “From 2001 to 2007, the FBI sought an increase of more than 1,100 agents for criminal investigations apart from national security. Instead, it suffered a decrease of 132 agents,” reports the Times. Over those same years, the FBI requested an increase of $800 million in funding for criminal investigations; it received one-sixteenth of that, notes the report.
Source: New York Times, Oct. 18.
Probe reportedly is examining whether execs made misleading statements about health of company, which collapsed in the wake of the subprime lending debacle; in related news, AIG says it will cancel many events after being caught sponsoring lavish getaways — even as the firm drew billions in government rescue funds
NEW YORK
Lehman Brothers, one of the investment banks at the heart of one of the biggest financial-ethics stories in recent history, is the subject of at least three federal criminal investigations, according to press reports last week.
Richard Fuld, Jr., Lehman’s former chairman and CEO, and Erin Callan, its former CFO, have been subpoenaed in the case, reports the Washington Post, citing unidentified sources.
Spokesmen for prosecutors and Lehman declined comment and lawyers for Fuld and Callan did not immediately respond to the Post story.
The Post says three grand juries are investigating the collapse of Lehman Brothers, which in September filed the largest bankruptcy claim in U.S. history.
The Dow Jones News Service reports that the probes appear to center on whether Lehman executives made false statements about the fiscal health of the firm shortly before its downfall.
In related news, American International Group (AIG), another casualty of the world financial crisis brought on by the collapse of mortgage-backed securities, last week agreed to cut back on spending for junkets, executive perks, and compensation for high-ranking employees, CNN reports.
AIG, which tapped into more than $120 billion in government aid after it could not cover losses on insurance-like products that it offered to investors, drew fire from Congress after it was discovered that even as it was drawing on a taxpayers’ rescue funds, it was holding events at lavish resorts, according to CNN.
Following the revelations, AIG said it would immediately cancel more than 160 planned events, including a $750,000 conference in Las Vegas, according to ABC News.
Sources: Washington Post, Oct. 18 — Dow Jones News Service, Oct. 18 — ABC News, Oct. 16 — CNN, Oct. 16.
For more information, see: Related Newsline story, Oct. 14 — Related Newsline Commentary, Oct. 6 — Related Newsline story, Oct. 6 — Related Newsline Commentary, Sep. 29 — Related Newsline story, Sep. 29.
Palin is subject of second ethics probe in Alaska; Obama is pressed on his association with group alleged to have engaged in voter fraud; in rare move, Florida paper retracts its endorsement after congressman is linked to scandal
VARIOUS DATELINES
Several stories specifically related to claims and counterclaims about ethical issues were part of the political news last week. Among them:
Sources: MSNBC, Oct. 17 — Hill, Oct. 17 — Slate, Oct. 16 — Palm Beach Post, Oct. 16 — AP, Oct. 16 — Bloomberg, Oct. 16 — Washington Post, Oct. 14 — Slate, Oct. 10.
For more information, see: Related Newsline Commentary, Oct. 14 — Related Newsline story, Oct. 14 — Related Newsline story, Sep. 29 — Related Newsline story, Sep. 22 — Related Newsline story, Sep. 15 — Related Newsline story, Sep. 15 — ACORN statement, Oct. 13.
Critics condemned the practice, which gave admitted students financial rewards for increasing their score, as a blatant attempt to game the system and boost the university’s rating in guidebooks
WACO, Tex.
Baylor University, in the words of the New York Times editorial-writers’ blog, was caught “red faced — and red handed” after it was revealed that the Baptist university was paying incoming freshmen to retake the SATs, the most widely used college admission test.
Times editorial writer Brent Staples reports: “Administrators claimed that they were merely giving admitted students a chance to burnish their records and win so-called merit scholarships. But it seems more likely that Baylor’s marketing team was trying to drive up the school’s test scores — and move it up in college rankings, like the ones issued by U.S. News & World Report.”
For its part, U.S. News & World Report condemned the program, saying there is “no academic value in asking students already enrolled at the university to retake a college admissions test. U.S. News disapproves of any educational policy that’s designed solely to manipulate data to boost a school’s ranking.”
High-school students can routinely elect to retake the SAT, but according to education journal Inside Higher Ed, Baylor appeared to be the only institution offering a financial incentive to do so.
Baylor University’s student newspaper, the Lariat, which U.S. News & World Report credits with breaking the story, followed up late last week, reporting that Baylor officials now admit they “goofed” and will no longer offer incentives to retesters.
The Lariat reports that Baylor gave $300 in bookstore credit to incoming freshmen who retook the SAT. If the students scored 50 points or more higher, they received an additional $1,000 per year in scholarship money.
Sources: New York Times, Oct. 17 — Inside Higher Ed, Oct. 17 — U.S. News & World Report, Oct. 17 — Lariat, Oct. 17 — New York Times, Oct. 15.
For more information, see: Related Newsline story, Sep. 15 — Related Newsline story, June 9 — Related Newsline story, May 5 — Related Newsline story, Mar. 31.
Critics say decision is motivated by profit and will make a bad situation worse as gambling problems mushroom in times of economic trouble
LONDON
Search engine giant Google will relax its global ban on gambling ads in England, Scotland, and Wales.
Google, which sports “Don’t Be Evil” as its corporate motto, said that gambling firms licensed in the United Kingdom will be allowed to place targeted ads on pages that deliver search results, reports the Times of London.
Critics claim that the global credit crunch is behind Google’s decision to alter its ethics stance, according to the Times.
“The bottom line really is it’s a lot of money,” advertising expert Hannah Kimuiu told the Times. “The gambling advertising industry is probably worth £100 million [roughly $170 million] a year. A lot of advertisers have had to half [sic] their budgets in the past year. They’ve got to recover this money somewhere.”
Google will retain the ban on gambling ads in the rest of the world, and will continue to refuse all ads worldwide for firearms, fireworks, dubious medical treatments, and prostitution, according to a report from the U.K. Guardian.
Various members of Parliament and church leaders immediately attacked the decision as “irresponsible,” reports the London-based Independent. Critics say problems engendered by gambling are becoming worse in the foundering global economy.
The Church of England said that recent studies show a 25-percent increase in people seeking help with gambling problems.
Google says it made its decision in light of Britain’s tolerance of gambling-related enterprises, saying in a statement that it is attempting to “be as consistent as possible with local business practices,” reports the Independent.
Google has been at the center of several recent ethics issues, including controversies over a decision to comply with Chinese censorship laws, the intrusiveness of its “Street View” mapping function, and fears that its new online encyclopedia will create a conflict of interest by pointing to Google content.
Sources: Times of London, Oct. 17 — Independent, Oct. 17 — Telegraph, Oct. 16 — Guardian, Oct. 16.
For more information, see: Related Newsline story, June 23 — Related Newsline story, May 27 — Related Newsline story, Aug. 11 — Related Newsline story, May 21, 2007 — Related Newsline story, Sep. 11, 2006.
At issue: press freedom in Vietnam, protecting rural Chinese from corruption, oversight of aid projects in danger zones, and plans for a new school for graft-fighters
VARIOUS DATELINES
Corruption was the topic of a range of stories from Asia and Europe last week. Among them:
Sources: UPI, Oct. 17 — U.K. Press Association, Oct. 16 — BBC, Oct. 16 — Reuters, Oct. 16 — AFP, Oct. 15.
For more information, see: Related Newsline story, Oct. 16 — Related Newsline story, Sep. 29 — Related Newsline story, Sep. 15 — Related Newsline story, Sep. 8 — Related Newsline Commentary, Aug. 4.
Increasingly complex web of interactions poses knotty moral issues
VARIOUS DATELINES
Food appears to be increasingly linked with ethical dilemmas, according to a variety of press reports. Among last week’s stories:
Sources: Council on Foreign Relations, Oct. 17 — Voice of America, Oct. 16 — San Francisco Chronicle, Oct. 16 — Scientific American, Oct. 15 — Los Angeles Times, Oct. 15.
For more information, see: Related Newsline story, Sep. 29 — Related Newsline story, Sep. 15 — Related Newsline story, Aug. 11 — Related Newsline story, Aug. 11 — Related Newsline story, July 28.
Local television station asks philosophy professor whether people were right to take advantage of the mistake
WISCONSIN RAPIDS, Wis.
An incident in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, last week brought ethical analysis right down to the level of the local gas pump.
UPI reports that a computer error at a gas station allowed self-serve customers to fill up at 34 cents a gallon. The actual price should have been $3.43.
The station lost thousands of dollars over the next 90 minutes because the owner could not reset the computer under a Wisconsin state law that makes it illegal to change gas prices more than once a day, according to WISC television in Madison.
USA Today reports that a station employee says word spread quickly: “People were calling people, those people called people, and by then the whole town probably knew.”
Television station WSAW in Wausau sought out a philosophy professor for his take on the issue.
Mark Brown, from the University of Wisconsin Marathon County, says the question of whether it was ethical for people to cash in on the mistake boils down to how you look at it.
Since we’re in a market economy, Brown told WSAW, it’s the costumer’s right to look for the best price and the store owner’s responsibility to ensure that his pricing mechanism is working properly.
But on an ethical level, Brown says, it’s different. “It is the personal responsibility of people who are living in the same community to not take advantage of their fellow community members.”
WSAW notes that as of the next day, not a single customer had returned to the station to pay back the difference.
Sources: USA Today, Oct. 17 — UPI, Oct. 15 — WISC (Madison, Wis.), Oct. 15 — WSAW (Wausau, Wis.), Oct. 15.
For more information, see: Related Newsline Commentary, Sep. 15 — Related Newsline story, July 7, 2007 — Related Newsline story, June 30 — Related Newsline story, May 27 — Related Newsline story, Feb. 18.
“Democrats and independents are more likely than Republicans to say the campaign has been too negative”: Pew
From the Pew Research Center:
“With less than three weeks to go before the election, there is a growing sense among the public that the tone of the presidential campaign has changed. A majority of Americans (55%) now say that the campaign is too negative. This is up significantly from 43% a month ago and represents a dramatic change from the beginning of the primary season when only 28% said the campaign was too negative. Perceptions of the tone of the current campaign are nearly identical to views of the 2004 presidential campaign. In October, 2004, 57% of registered voters said the campaign was too negative.
“In spite of criticism about the tone of the campaign, the public remains highly engaged in the process. Fully 71% say the campaign is interesting, and a strong majority (63%) says the campaign has been informative thus far….
“Democrats and independents are more likely than Republicans to say the campaign has been too negative…. Today, 62% of Democrats and 57% of independents say the campaign is too negative, while only 47% of Republicans agree….
“Democrats overwhelmingly believe that Obama’s television ads are truthful, while they doubt the veracity of McCain’s. Similarly, Republicans believe McCain’s ads are truthful, while a plurality says Obama’s are not. Independents have a much more favorable view of Obama’s ads than they do of McCain’s. By a margin of 42%-26% independents say Obama’s ads are truthful. When it comes to McCain’s ads, independents are evenly divided: 32% say they are truthful and 33% say they are not….
“Public views of the candidates continue to fluctuate. For John McCain and Sarah Palin, changing views are more negative than positive. In the survey conducted Oct. 10-13, fully a third of the public say their opinion of McCain has become less favorable in recent days, while only 17% say their view of the GOP nominee has become more favorable.
“Views of Sarah Palin also turned more negative: 38% say their opinion of Palin has become less favorable in recent days, while 21% say their opinion of the Alaska governor has become more favorable. Palin’s public image had improved significantly the week of the vice presidential debate. Since then, the views of Republicans, who rallied behind her after the debate, have become more static, and the views of independents have become less favorable.
“Obama’s image improved somewhat last week: 29% say their view of the Democratic nominee has become more favorable in recent days while 21% say it has become less favorable. Views of Joe Biden have changed relatively little: 23% say their opinion of Biden has become more favorable recently, 14% say their opinion has become less favorable and 56% say their view of Biden has not changed in recent days….
“Impressions of press coverage run strongly along party lines. In the current poll, fully 70% of Democrats rate press coverage positively, but fewer than four-in-ten (38%) Republicans share this view. Independents, meanwhile, are divided on the subject….
“Opinions about the quality of campaign coverage appear to be correlated with age. A 59% majority of young people (ages 18-34) rate press coverage positively, while middle-aged Americans are more divided on the quality of campaign reporting. Among older Americans (those 65 and older), most say the coverage is only fair or poor (53%), compared with 44% who say it is excellent or good….”
For the full press release, Oct. 16, click here.
“Men do less than they ought, unless they do all that they can.”
–Thomas Carlyle (Scottish essayist and historian, 1795-1881)
free casino
"free slot games no download" Casino New Bonusno deposit bonus for us players!
Party City Casino free play casino games cleopatra free online slots Canadian On Line Casinos free printable las vegas casino coupons! canadian on line casinos No Deposit Bonus Code Free igt slots freeslots with no download 334. play free igt slots! Casino Slots online casinos no deposit codes free slots casino downloads Games Free To Play Now slot games free online slot games with no download? Soaring Eagle Casino spin casino, free bonus codes online casino Instant No Deposit Casino Codes casino slots free play no deposit online casino codes Free Fishing Slot Machine Games las vegas usa no deposit bonus codes 1 hour free casinos; Play Slots For Free No Money usa free no deposit casino monopoly money free no download roulette games Free Money Casino No Deposit usa friendly casinos online with no deposit bonus free spins no deposit casino forums Online Casino No Deposit Codes newest no deposit slot bonuses cirrus casino no deposit bonus codes? Free No Download Roulette Games no deposit required casino lists! slots of fun? Online Slots No Deposit Bonus For All Rtg sportsbook no deposit bonus new no deposit casino bonus codes New Casinos With Free Cash No Deposit no deposit casino usa new no deposit rtg casino codes Free Bonus Code With All Slots Casino texas tea slots for free free download casino games for mac; Free Gambling At Cherry Casino club player no deposit bonus codes instant no deposit casino codes Freeslotmachines brand new casinos onlinefree hour play for usa members?
Casino Slots Free Play casinos online with no deposits microgaming casino with sign up bonus; Onstant Free Flash Casinos free slotmachines free online cherry slot games No Deposit Casino Bonus freecasinoslots slot of vegas no deposit codes? Usa Online Casino Bonus Code List search one hour free play casinos with no deposites free casino cash The Munsters Slot Machine free chips no deposit no down load monopoly casino download Play Free Online Casino Slot Games google freeslots