Moral Values Lose Ground as Motivating Factor among U.S. Voters
May 25th, 2009 • Posted in: Statline
For more information, see this week’s Research Report.

For more information, see this week’s Research Report.
by Rushworth M. Kidder
According to chaos theory, the flap of a butterfly’s wings in Brazil can influence a tornado’s track in Texas. But can a $600 bill for horse manure convulse the Mother of Parliaments, threaten a government, and help extend a global recession? Apparently so, given the moral outrage now seething through the United Kingdom.
The manure tab — along with invoices for mouse poison and sunflower seeds, worth another $6.30 at today’s exchange rates — was submitted as a parliamentary expense by David Heathcoat-Amory, a backbench Conservative in the House of Commons, to maintain the gardens at his second home near Glastonbury.
By itself, the Glastonbury grift would be inconsequential. But as part of a pastiche of revelations published in recent weeks by one of London’s most respected newspapers, the Daily Telegraph, it has become part of a scandal that has gripped the British conscience with unrelenting force. The newspaper’s stories have detailed the expenses claimed by members of Parliament (MPs) under rules that allow them to recover costs for maintaining second homes in London. According to the newspaper, scores of MPs have claimed reimbursement for items ranging from cleaning a country-house moat and purchasing a trouser press to completing major renovations and covering excessive mortgage payments. Some members, by switching their second-home designation between various properties, effectively have used taxpayer funds to upgrade and sell homes — and, in at least one case, to avoid paying capital gains on the sale.
Outrageous? Evidently. The picture of high-living public servants fiddling their expense reports couldn’t have come at a worse moment, as their constituents struggle through a severe economic downturn.
Historic? Profoundly. Last week’s resignation of Michael Martin over this issue marks the first forcible removal of a sitting speaker of the House of Commons in more than 300 years.
Economically troubling? Apparently. Standard & Poor’s, the credit rating agency, lowered its outlook on Britain to negative for the first time last week, noting not only a growing national debt but swelling public uncertainty in the run-up to the next election, due by mid-2010.
Politically transformative? Quite possibly. Polls suggest that the scandal, which is tainting the Labour, Conservative, and Liberal parties alike, is ginning up new interest in the country’s far-right British National Party and the more moderate U.K. Independence Party.
But illegal? Here things get tougher. Under Westminster’s rules, many of these expenses were completely legal. Others were apparently so commonplace that they easily slipped by under the everyone-else-is-doing-it test. In any case, the fiscal impact is minute: Rolled together, these payments are merely a rounding error in the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s accounts.
But that’s not the point. The dazzling significance of this development is precisely its butterfly-wing smallness. Students of chaos theory, noting that tiny changes in initial conditions can have enormous long-term impacts, like to explain that a boulder balanced on a mountain peak could roll into any one of several different valleys depending on a half-inch adjustment to its starting position. At Westminster, similarly, even a small deviation of Parliament’s attentiveness — given the international leverage of London’s financial markets — could theoretically spell the difference between a short and a long recession.
If Parliament had been able to focus its energy for the last two weeks on global economic progress rather than local constituency outrage, would London still have its triple-A outlook from Standard & Poor’s? Absent this scandal, would a majority of voters have remained loyal to one of the nation’s two major parties, rather than invoking Shakespeare’s towering curse — “a plague o’ both your houses!” — and perhaps edged the nation closer to the multiparty chaos plaguing so many parliamentary democracies? Would British subjects have retained a greater modicum of trust in the ethical standards of their public officials?
By its very nature, public trust is ultimately reflected in public sentiment. And in the end, it is public sentiment that will determine the course of this recession. How and when consumers decide to spend — how they execute billions of choices as they perch like boulders on the peaks of millions of family budgets around the world — will shape the course of our collective future. But consumers only spend when they believe the economy is healthy enough to let them replenish their personal coffers. And that belief grows directly out of their trust that politicians will do the right thing — a trust that, over the last two weeks in Great Britain, has been shattered.
Maybe flaps over corruption, even about things as slight as Glastonbury manure, really can change the global economy. Maybe a small moral deviation in the initial conditions of a dynamic economic and political system really can make a long-term difference. Maybe, in other words, these British butterflies are proving something we’ve long suspected: that in ethics, as in chaos theory, it really is the little things that matter most.
©2009 Institute for Global Ethics
Questions or comments? Write to newsline@globalethics.org.
“The lesson here is that these cases aren’t going away. If a jury found Shell guilty, this would change the behavior of the industry pretty quickly.”
– Arvind Ganesan, the head of the business and human rights practice at Human Rights Watch, talking to the New York Times about this week’s trial of oil giant Royal Dutch Shell on charges of crimes against humanity. Shell will be put on trial in New York for its alleged role in abetting the execution of Nigerian author and activist Ken Saro-Wiwa, a thorn in the company’s side over its operations in impoverished African communities. Shell has denied the charges, but must prove its case in court — one of multiple legal cases against international oil companies operating in developed countries — notes the Times.
Source: New York Times, May 22.
For more information, see: Related Newsline story, Sep. 27, 2004 — Related Newsline story, Mar. 31, 2003 — Related Newsline story, Apr. 1, 2002 — Related Newsline story, June 25, 2001 — Related Newsline story, Apr. 2, 2001.
President acknowledges that some terror suspects may have to be held indefinitely without trial; harsh interrogation remains on agenda as Obama and former VP engage in unusual public debate; House Speaker says she’s said all she’s going to say on question of what she knew about waterboarding and when
WASHINGTON
Conflict over the moral and legal ramifications of imprisoning terror suspects continued to simmer last week. Among the coverage:
Sources: Washington Post, May. 22 — CNN, May 22 — AP, May 22 — CNN, May 21.
For more information, see: Related Newsline story, May 18 — Related Newsline story, Apr. 27 — Related Newsline story, Apr. 20 — Related Newsline story, Apr. 13.
More than 2,000 people have given evidence in nine-year probe
DUBLIN and BELFAST
A scathing report on abuse in Ireland’s church-run schools and orphanages documents decades of sexual abuse, beatings, and near slave-like conditions at the institutions.
ABC News reports that the study chronicles sexual, physical, and emotional abuse by Catholic priests and nuns from 1930 until the current system of church-run schools was closed in the 1990s.
Cardinal Sean Brady, leader of the Catholic Church in Ireland, responded, according to ABC, by saying, “I am profoundly sorry and deeply ashamed that children suffered in such awful ways in these institutions. Children deserved better and especially from those caring for them in the name of Jesus Christ.”
The report by the Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse, published last week, concludes that cases of sexual abuse were covered up by the congregations that ran the institutions and offenders were routinely transferred to other locations, where they often abused again, reports Dublin-based Irish Times.
More than 2,000 people gave evidence in the nine-year inquiry, according to TIME magazine. The report contains 2,600 pages in five volumes.
In addition to sexual abuse, the report documents routine beatings and “penal colony” conditions in workshops, farms, and laundries, where the students provided free labor for the religious orders.
The Irish government also was criticized for colluding in the silence, notes the Reuters news agency.
A lawsuit by the Christian Brothers prompted the commission to omit names of the alleged abusers from the report, and no one will be prosecuted, according to Reuters.
Sources: Reuters, May 22 — ABC News, May 22 — Irish Times, May 21 — TIME, May 21.
For more information, see: Related Newsline story, May 12 — Related Newsline story, Apr. 21 — Related Newsline story, Dec. 10, 2007 — Related Newsline story, Sep. 17, 2007 — Related Newsline story, Sep. 10, 2007.
Companies cite need to protect corporate image; not surprisingly, most workers don’t agree
NEW YORK
The boss wants to keep an eye on the image you project on social-networking sites like Facebook and Twitter. That’s the message from a new Deloitte survey that underscores the practical and ethical dilemmas faced by workers who want to communicate freely on their own time and companies that have spent fortunes to burnish their image and want to protect it, reports BusinessWeek.
Sixty percent of the executives interviewed by Deloitte said they believed they had a right to monitor how employees portray themselves and their organizations. But more than half of the employees questioned say their social communication is none of their employer’s business, according to a summary of the study in Bizjournals.com.
A variety of news media worldwide localized the results of the survey and examined the often-uncomfortable mix of social media and employment. The Sydney Morning Herald, for example, profiled a worker who bemoaned her love life in Facebook only to find that her venting had become the hot topic in the boardroom of her marketing company.
The Financial Times notes that the dilemma recently played out among media employees themselves after Dow Jones imposed ethics restrictions on how workers at the Wall Street Journal and other publications could use Facebook and Twitter.
Prohibitions against “friending” confidential sources and promoting one’s own work were among the strictures, according to an Editor & Publisher column that reprinted an internal Wall Street Journal email.
Editor’s Note: Deloitte is a corporate sponsor of Ethics Newsline®.
Sources: BusinessWeek, May 21 — Bizjournals.com, May 19 — Sydney Morning Herald, May 18 — Financial Times, May 18 — Editor & Publisher, May 14.
For more information, see: Related Newsline story, Apr. 6 — Related Newsline story, Feb. 23 — Related Newsline story, Jan. 12 — Related Newsline story, Dec. 10, 2007 — Related Newsline story, Dec. 3, 2007 — 2009 Deloitte “Ethics & Workplace Survey,” undated.
Executive with Chinese state news agency lectures Western media who “covered up” roots of financial crisis; columnist returns speaking fee and gets a lecture from rival paper; Google resumes massive digitizing project after settlement on copyright infringement
VARIOUS DATELINES
Controversies involving free press, conflict of interest, and intellectual property were major topics last week. Among the stories:
Sources: New York Times, May 24 — Wall Street Journal, May 22 — Media Bistro, May 21 — Los Angeles Times, May 21 — Detroit News, May 21 — Los Angles Times, May 13.
For more information, see: Related Newsline story, May 18 — Related Newsline story, Apr. 27 — Related Newsline story, Apr. 20 — Related Newsline story, Mar. 30 — Related Newsline story, Feb. 23.
His mother spirits him into hiding, fueling the latest in a series of disputes over the rights of religious practice versus the rights of the state to protect children
NEW ULM, Minn.
Religious conviction, medical science, and the law were at odds last week as a Minnesota mother disappeared with her cancer-stricken son, defying court orders that the youngster receive chemotherapy.
Colleen Hauser and her 13-year-old son Daniel fled their rural Minnesota home last week, prompting a nationwide search that ended on Monday night after the pair gave up their attempt to flee treatment, reports the Associated Press.
The Hausers belong to a religious group that advocates natural and homeopathic treatments.
Newsweek reports that the Hauser case is the latest in a string of incidents in which medical treatment imposed by law has come into conflict with parents’ beliefs, including recent controversies involving mandatory inoculation and children’s rights to medical privacy.
In what is typically a thorny series of moral dilemmas, state law frequently weighs the risks associated with the treatments versus the perceived benefit. “There’s got to be a balancing of potential benefits against potential harm,” Alan Meisel, director for the center of bioethics and health law at the University of Pittsburgh, told Newsweek. “In some situations you have a treatment where the likelihood of success is very small, and in situations like that, the courts are much less likely to order the treatment.”
Most states have legal exemptions that provide limited protection to parents who withhold medical care on religious grounds, reports USA Today. Those laws also typically discourage prosecution of parents whose children die following such disputes.
Press commentary spanned a spectrum of views, reports the Week, a news-summary magazine. One medical analyst condemned the parents for making a “martyr” out of the child, another advocated mandatory chemotherapy while complaining that the state moved an a draconian fashion in this case, and another physician urged readers not to judge the boy’s parents too harshly, noting that chemotherapy is a grueling process that “can indeed give even a dying person pause.”
Sources: AP, May 25 — The Week, May 22 — USA Today, May 21 — UPI, May 20 — Newsweek, May 18.
For more information, see: Related Newsline story, Feb. 9 — Related Newsline story, Dec. 22, 2008 — Related Newsline story, July 14, 2008 — Related Newsline story, Feb. 6, 2006 — Related Newsline story, Jun. 21, 2004.
Tobacco companies and credit-card firms altering business plans; MBAs face discouraging job market
NEW YORK and WASHINGTON
Among the top news from the business-ethics file:
Sources: Bloomberg, May 22 — AP, May 22 — New York Times, May 21 — CNBC, May 20.
For more information, see: Related Newsline story, May 4 — Related Newsline Commentary, May 4 — Related Newsline story, Aug. 25, 2008 — Related Newsline story, May 14, 2007 — Related Newsline story, Jan. 22, 2007.
New study shows leaders of low-reputation firms use broad, evasive language
BOSTON
A new study purports to show that certain types of evasive language in a CEO’s annual letters to stockholders can be a warning sign to investors, reports the Christian Science Monitor.
Two professors from the University of Nebraska at Lincoln found that the CEOs of companies with high reputations used clearer, more direct language than those heading firms of lower repute.
“The good guys use shorter words, fewer words — and the words they do choose are concrete words,” Janice Lawrence, director of the university’s business ethics program and coauthor of the study, told the Monitor. “The bad guys use more adjectives; their words are longer; and the words aren’t as concrete.”
Using content analysis software, the researchers could sort the letters from high-reputation firms and low-reputation firms correctly 81 percent of the time.
While co-author Lawrence concedes that the average investor can’t detect the symptomatic language with the efficiency of the computer, she tells the Monitor that people often can rely just on gut feeling.
“We’ve all had times when someone gave a talk and you feel they just talked all around the issue and didn’t get right down to it,” Lawrence said.
Source: Christian Science Monitor, May 20.
For more information, see: Related Newsline story, Mar. 9 — Related Newsline story, Feb. 2 — Related Newsline story, Jan. 26 — Related Newsline story, Jan. 19 — Related Newsline story, July 27, 1998.
Pew survey charting the rise of independents also finds that the “proportion of voters citing moral values as most important has declined sharply since 2004″
From the Pew Research Center:
“Centrism has emerged as a dominant factor in public opinion as the Obama era begins. The political values and core attitudes that the Pew Research Center has monitored since 1987 show little overall ideological movement. Republicans and Democrats are even more divided than in the past, while the growing political middle is steadfastly mixed in its beliefs about government, the free market and other values that underlie views on contemporary issues and policies. Nor are there indications of a continuation of the partisan realignment that began in the Bush years. Both political parties have lost adherents since the election and an increasing number of Americans identify as independents.
“The proportion of independents now equals its highest level in 70 years. Owing to defections from the Republican Party, independents are more conservative on several key issues than in the past. While they like and approve of Barack Obama, as a group independents are more skittish than they were two years ago about expanding the social safety net and are reluctant backers of greater government involvement in the private sector. Yet at the same time, they continue to more closely parallel the views of Democrats rather than Republicans on the most divisive core beliefs on social values, religion and national security….
“…Taking an average of surveys conducted this year, 36% say they are independents, 35% are Democrats, while 23% are Republicans….
“Republicans and Democrats hold increasingly divergent views about the role of government, the environment and many other issues. As the partisan divide widens, the overall course of the public’s thinking is being determined by the tilt in opinions among the growing number of independents, who have a more moderate ideological point of view….
“But independents continue to be much closer to Democrats than to Republicans with respect to social values, religiosity and beliefs about national security….
“What is clear is that the Republican Party is facing formidable demographic challenges. Its constituents are aging and do not reflect the growing ethnic and racial diversity of the general public. As was the case at the beginning of this decade, Republicans are predominantly non-Hispanic whites (88%)…. At the same time, the average age of Republicans increased from 45.5 to 48.3, while the average age of Democrats has remained fairly stable. For the first time in at least two decades, Republicans are older than Democrats on average.
“Republicans continue to be disproportionately comprised of Southerners (39%) and white evangelical Protestants (35%)….
“Fully 75% of Republicans today say that government regulation of business does more harm than good, up from 57% two years ago….
“There is no sign that the public is turning inward in response to difficult economic times. A larger share of Americans — and especially Democrats — completely agree that the U.S. should play an active role in world affairs….
“While opinions about global engagement and foreign affairs have not been affected by the recession, this is not the case with respect to environmental attitudes. The public continues to broadly support stricter environmental laws and regulation, but its willingness to pay higher prices, and suffer slower economic growth for the sake of environmental protection has declined substantially from two years ago….
“The values survey finds wide political and religious differences over traditional values and social policy issues, such as gay marriage. However, issues relating to religion and morality clearly have less political punch than during the 2004 election. The current survey finds that just 10% say they would consider moral values as the most important issue in their vote in a hypothetical presidential election….
“As the proportion citing moral values as most important has declined sharply since 2004, the economy and jobs have come to dominate the public’s concerns: 50% now point to the economy as most important compared with 21% of voters in the 2004 post-election survey….
“Moreover, over the past decade there has been erosion in the percentage of Americans holding conservative views on family, homosexuality and gender roles. The decline in social conservatism is a result of generational change. Younger age cohorts are less conservative than older ones…. Societal change in these values is mostly a consequence of newer generations replacing older ones.
“Following the election of Obama, blacks now have a more positive view of American society….”
For more information, see: Full press release from Pew, May 21 — Full text of report from Pew.
“To profit from good advice requires more wisdom than to give it.”
John Churton Collins (English literary critic, 1848-1908)

For more information, see: Pew press release, May 11 — Related Newsline Research Report, May 11.
by Rushworth M. Kidder
As a small boy, I grew up with a 1920s Louis Armstrong recording of W. C. Handy’s “Loveless Love.” In his trademark gravelly voice, the cornet player they called Satchmo delivered a pithy social commentary that has stuck with me through the years:
Love, oh love, oh loveless love,
Has set our heart on goalless goals:
From milkless milk and silkless silk,
We are growing used to soulless souls.Such grafting times we never saw –
That’s why we have a pure food law.
In everything we find a flaw,
Even love, oh love, oh loveless love.
If Satchmo were around today, imagine how he could have improvised on that theme of “grafting times!” Here’s a snapshot from last week alone:
And that’s just the big-dollar financial stuff. Also bubbling away:
What to do about it all? One approach, of course, is more rule-making. In a widely reported speech last week, U.S. assistant attorney general Christine Varney called for tough new antitrust regulations, effectively reversing the more laissez faire approach of the Bush administration. While noting that there is “no adequate substitute for a competitive market, particularly during times of economic distress,” she concluded that “passive monitoring of market participants is not an option” and identified antitrust regulation and enforcement as a “frontline issue” in the government’s response to the economic downturn.
Which takes us back to Satchmo. If he were updating Handy’s lyrics for 2009, he might have noted that investors buy trustless trusts, pilots take careless care, and citizens get ethics-less ethics commissions. But his riff goes deeper. When integrity ebbs, the response is inevitable: We get the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the upcoming flood of financial-industry regulations. In other words, we get more rules.
But Satchmo’s real chiller is his last line. Under the steady water-drip of corruption, we’re numbed into accepting “loveless love.” When ethics collapses, our deepest emotional and intuitional feelings are betrayed, squelched, and deadened by counterfeits that look like love but aren’t. We catch a glimpse of what it would be like to live in a moral void that can’t tell the real from the fake.
For that condition, law-making offers no real remedy. These days, the old saying that “You can’t legislate morality” is truer than ever. There’s no rule that can impose integrity on a populace that doesn’t care about it. Integrity grows up from within, among people who see that they can’t survive without it. Just as there’s no quick fix for loveless love, there’s no legislative pill for valueless values. Yes, we’re in for whole new round of “pure food law.” But unless today’s rule-makers also hammer home an expectation of integrity — calling strongly on individuals and organizations to do the right thing even though nobody’s looking — we’ll find ourselves still duped by counterfeits.
I suspect Satchmo knew all that. But he also sang with an optimistic twinkle in his eye. His music, rooted in the gospel singers’ against-all-odds faith, grew out of the tailgate Dixieland that celebrated funerals with buoyant hope. He knew his audience wouldn’t settle for milkless milk, silkless silk, or loveless love. So he warned them about flimflams, feints, and frauds. Sometimes that warning is all it takes to spark the vigilance that bites the coin, holds the twenty up to the light, casts aside the phony, and demands the sort of moral reform that goes deeper than any rule can reach.
©2009 Institute for Global Ethics
Questions or comments? Write to newsline@globalethics.org.
“The publication of these photos would not add any additional benefit to our understanding of what was carried out in the past by a small number of individuals. In fact, the most direct consequence of releasing them, I believe, would be to further inflame anti-American opinion and to put our troops in greater danger.”
– U.S. president Barack Obama, explaining last week his U-turn on releasing photos depicting prisoner abuse by U.S. troops and personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan. The photos — some of which have been leaked and reprinted in Europe — reportedly are similar to those that sparked the Abu Ghraib scandal. Obama’s about-face is examined in a New York Times piece that looks at how similar suppress-versus-release dilemmas have been handled by past administrations and courts. The key question, notes the article: “How much potential harm justifies suppressing facts, whether from My Lai or Iraq, that might help the public judge the way a war is waged in its name?”
Source: New York Times, May 16.
For more information, see: Related Newsline story, Apr. 30, 2007 — Related Newsline story, Mar. 13, 2006 — Related Newsline story, Feb. 20, 2006.
Tribunals revived, stunning some who anticipated end of process; Obama changes stance and says he will fight release of photos showing prisoner abuse by U.S. troops; House speaker and CIA chief espouse different versions of who knew what about waterboarding — and when
WASHINGTON
Treatment of terrorism suspects was the axis of much ethical debate last week. Among the top stories:
Sources: CBS News, May 16 — Washington Post, May 16 — U.S. News & World Report, May 15.
For more information, see: Related Newsline story, May 11 — Related Newsline story, May 4 — Related Newsline story, Apr. 27 — Related Newsline story, Apr. 20 — Related Newsline story, Apr. 13.
Leaked details of parliamentarians’ expenses show they’ve been taking taxpayer money for non-existent mortgage expenses, chandeliers, and even moat-cleaning on their country estates
LONDON
While Britain has endured several political-ethics scandals in recent years, few have sparked the outrage of what’s been dubbed the “expenses scandal.”
According to the Associated Press’s London bureau chief Paisley Dodds, few of those prior scandals “tarnished all three of the country’s main political parties in a single stroke.”
“Leaked lawmaker expenses for chandeliers, pornography, moat upkeep on country estates, and other claims,” Dodds writes, “have enraged voters — many of whom have lost jobs and homes during Britain’s deepening recession.”
“Talk show lines buzzed Friday with irate callers. Websites flashed reader comments comparing politicians to greedy bankers. And commuters clenched newspapers with such headlines as: ‘Parliament’s Darkest Day’ and ‘House of Ill Repute.’ Many politicians were being heckled during events that had been scheduled long before the leak.”
The furor comes after records of parliamentarians’ expenses were leaked to the press. So far, two MPs have been suspended, according to Reuters. One of the suspended lawmakers was alleged to have taken $20,000 in compensation for a mortgage he already had paid off.
Scotland Yard is now looking into whether criminal charges are to be filed in any of the cases, reports the Times of London.
Sources: AP, May 16 — Reuters, May 16 — Times of London, May 16 — BBC, May 15.
For more information, see: Related Newsline story, Feb. 2 — Related Newsline story, Sep. 29, 2008 — Related Newsline story, Aug. 4, 2008 — Related Newsline story, July 23, 2007 — Related Newsline story, May 14, 2007.
Brian Mulroney denies wrongdoing, but says he did not show good judgment in taking cash-stuffed envelopes from businessman and lobbyist
OTTAWA
An ethics inquiry into former prime minister Brian Mulroney has riveted the attention of Canadians.
The probe centers on the relationship between Mulroney and German-Canadian arms dealer and lobbyist Karlheinz Schreiber.
Dominating hearings last week was testimony that Mulroney took cash-stuffed envelopes from Schreiber in the 16 months after he stepped down as prime minister in 1993, reports the CanWest news service.
Mulroney says he was retained by Schreiber’s firm to do consulting after he left office, and was surprised when Schreiber gave him cash — the amount is pegged at between $225,000 and $300,000 — in envelopes during three separate meetings, reports the Canadian Press.
Critics have alleged that arrangement for the payments may have been made while Mulroney was in office, a possible breach of Canada’s ethics code.
Mulroney has denied any wrongdoing, but admitted that taking the cash payments was a “significant error in judgment,” reports the Toronto Star. Mulroney also conceded that he created the appearance of impropriety by putting the money into a safe-deposit box, rather than depositing it into a bank account.
Mulroney said Schreiber explained the cash payments by saying he was an international businessman and only dealt in cash, according to a report from CTV.
Sources: CanWest, May 16 — Canadian Press, May 16 — Toronto Star, May 16 — CTV, May 15.
For more information, see: Related Newsline story, June 2, 2008 — Related Newsline story, Mar. 3, 2008 — Related Newsline story, Feb. 25, 2008 — Related Newsline story, Feb. 18, 2008 — Related Newsline story, Feb. 4, 2008.
European Union alleges that the computer chip-maker funneled secret rebates to computer manufacturers
LONDON
Computer chipmaker Intel was fined roughly $1.45 billion by the European Commission (EC) last week for violating antitrust regulations.
The EC said Intel engaged in illegal anticompetitive practices to exclude competitors from the market, including giving hidden rebates to computer manufacturers if they bought their chips from Intel, reports technology network CNET.
Intel plans to appeal the EC decision and is preparing to fight similar allegations in the United States, according to the San Jose Mercury-News.
Intel CEO Paul Otellini told the Wall Street Journal that he is “baffled” by the allegations and says that Intel never played any of the tricks alleged by the EC, insisting that there is no evidence whatsoever to back up the claims.
The EC fine is expected to prompt numerous civil suits against the company, notes trade journal PC World.
Sources: San Jose Mercury-News, May 16 — PC World, May 16 — CNET, May 15 — Wall Street Journal, May 15.
For more information, see: Related Newsline story, Apr. 12, 2004 — Related Newsline story, Apr. 6, 2003 — Related Newsline story, Apr. 16, 2001 — Related Newsline story, Oct. 2, 2000 — Related Newsline story, Nov. 15, 1999.
The complex investments have been blamed, in part, for lack of transparency that led to monetary implosion
NEW YORK and LONDON
The Obama administration last week proposed new regulations for the murky world of derivatives.
According to the Los Angeles Times, derivatives — complex and exotic investment vehicles — played a major role in the reckless financial gamesmanship that brought down insurance giant AIG and shook markets worldwide.
MSNBC adds that the proposal would, for the first time, enable regulators to shine a light into the inner workings of the derivative markets, regulate the firms that issue them, and curb the risks that traders can take.
One of the more likely regulatory mechanisms, according to Bloomberg, is a system that will require data on derivatives to be posted on the Internet.
The London-based Financial Times notes that the September 2008 collapse of Lehman Brothers was a key turning point in the long-forestalled efforts to regulate derivatives because it demonstrated the vast exposure of markets worldwide to the contagion of one derivative-based implosion.
Sources: Los Angeles Times, May 15 — MSNBC, May 14 — Bloomberg, May 14 — Financial Times, May 14.
For more information, see: Related Newsline story, May 11 — Related Newsline story, Mar. 30 — Related Newsline Commentary, Mar. 2 — Related Newsline story, Oct. 27, 2008 — Related Newsline Commentary, Oct. 20, 2008.
free casino
"free slot games no download" Casino New Bonusno deposit bonus for us players!
Party City Casino free play casino games cleopatra free online slots Canadian On Line Casinos free printable las vegas casino coupons! canadian on line casinos No Deposit Bonus Code Free igt slots freeslots with no download 334. play free igt slots! Casino Slots online casinos no deposit codes free slots casino downloads Games Free To Play Now slot games free online slot games with no download? Soaring Eagle Casino spin casino, free bonus codes online casino Instant No Deposit Casino Codes casino slots free play no deposit online casino codes Free Fishing Slot Machine Games las vegas usa no deposit bonus codes 1 hour free casinos; Play Slots For Free No Money usa free no deposit casino monopoly money free no download roulette games Free Money Casino No Deposit usa friendly casinos online with no deposit bonus free spins no deposit casino forums Online Casino No Deposit Codes newest no deposit slot bonuses cirrus casino no deposit bonus codes? Free No Download Roulette Games no deposit required casino lists! slots of fun? Online Slots No Deposit Bonus For All Rtg sportsbook no deposit bonus new no deposit casino bonus codes New Casinos With Free Cash No Deposit no deposit casino usa new no deposit rtg casino codes Free Bonus Code With All Slots Casino texas tea slots for free free download casino games for mac; Free Gambling At Cherry Casino club player no deposit bonus codes instant no deposit casino codes Freeslotmachines brand new casinos onlinefree hour play for usa members?
Casino Slots Free Play casinos online with no deposits microgaming casino with sign up bonus; Onstant Free Flash Casinos free slotmachines free online cherry slot games No Deposit Casino Bonus freecasinoslots slot of vegas no deposit codes? Usa Online Casino Bonus Code List search one hour free play casinos with no deposites free casino cash The Munsters Slot Machine free chips no deposit no down load monopoly casino download Play Free Online Casino Slot Games google freeslots